One of the branches of Islamic jurisprudential issues for which there are conflicting narrations is the matter of intentionally remaining in a state of ritual impurity (Arabic: جنابت janabah) until the dawn call to prayer (Arabic: اذان adhan) during the holy month of Ramadan. Faced with these (conflicting) narrations, Islamic jurists ( pl. : fuqahāʾ, Arabic: فقیه; pl. : فقهاء ) have adopted various approaches. This research, utilizing a descriptive-analytical method and drawing upon documentary sources, seeks to review the Quranic, narrational, and jurisprudential arguments in the views of Islamic jurists and presents a novel inference from the totality of verbal evidences. To achieve this goal, after categorizing the narrations, the views of the Islamic jurists are critically studied by presenting five approaches. The selected perspective is based on the conceptual understanding of "deliberation" ("ta'ammud" include cases where a person knows that if they sleep, they will not wake up until the Adhan, and yet they still sleep) in the narrations and finding a narration that serves as a unifying proof to resolve the contradiction between the reports. Based on this interpretation (i.e., the conceptual analysis of intention" and finding a reconciling narration), there is no need to interpret some narrations as taqiyyah (Arabic: تقیه dissimulation due to fear of persecution), disregard some narrations, or prefer some over others. All narrations play a role in the process of jurisprudential inference. The evaluation of the paper is that the lack of deliberate intention in achieving ritual purity ( Arabic: طهارة tahara) until the dawn call to prayer, which arises from situations such as falling asleep due to fatigue or unaware the passage of time, will not invalidate the fast. In cases where a person intentionally delays achieving ritual purity until the morning Adhan, in addition to the obligation of making up the fast ( Arabic: قَضَىqadaʾ)), they will also be obligated to abstain from eating or drinking for the rest of that day (Arabic: امساکImsak) and pay expiation (Arabic: کفاره Kaffarah).
سبیتی، یوسف علی، (۱۴۳۶ق)، «مفطریة تعمد البقاء علی الجنابة حتی الفجر؛ قرائة النقدیة»، اجتهاد و تجدید، شمارۀ ۳۲ و ۳۳، ص۳۸۱-۳۹۲، پاییز و زمستان.
سرخسی، محمد بن ابیسهل، (۱۴۲۱ق)، المبسوط، بیروت: دار الفکر.
سلّار دیلمی، حمزه بن عبدالعزیز، (۱۴۰۴ق)، المراسم فی الفقه الاسلامی، قم: منشورات الحرمین.
سلیمانی بروجردی، میرزا علی، (۱۳۹۳ش)، «حکم باقی ماندن بر جنابت برای روزهداران تا اذان صبح از دیدگاه آیةالله العظمی دکتر شیخ محمد صادقی تهرانی»، مجموعه مقالات دومین همایش بیداری قرآنی، تهران: شکرانه، ص۳۶۵-۳۷۹.
Muhaqqiq Garfami, A. , Sajadizadeh, S. A. and Morvarid, A. (2023). Re-Examination of the Evidence for the Islamic Ruling on the Intentional Retention of Ritual Impurity (Janabah) until Dawn in the Month of Ramadan. Jurisprudence of worship Doctrines, 4(6), 111-140. doi: 10.30513/jwd.2024.6000.1190
MLA
Muhaqqiq Garfami, A. , , Sajadizadeh, S. A. , and Morvarid, A. . "Re-Examination of the Evidence for the Islamic Ruling on the Intentional Retention of Ritual Impurity (Janabah) until Dawn in the Month of Ramadan", Jurisprudence of worship Doctrines, 4, 6, 2023, 111-140. doi: 10.30513/jwd.2024.6000.1190
HARVARD
Muhaqqiq Garfami, A., Sajadizadeh, S. A., Morvarid, A. (2023). 'Re-Examination of the Evidence for the Islamic Ruling on the Intentional Retention of Ritual Impurity (Janabah) until Dawn in the Month of Ramadan', Jurisprudence of worship Doctrines, 4(6), pp. 111-140. doi: 10.30513/jwd.2024.6000.1190
CHICAGO
A. Muhaqqiq Garfami , S. A. Sajadizadeh and A. Morvarid, "Re-Examination of the Evidence for the Islamic Ruling on the Intentional Retention of Ritual Impurity (Janabah) until Dawn in the Month of Ramadan," Jurisprudence of worship Doctrines, 4 6 (2023): 111-140, doi: 10.30513/jwd.2024.6000.1190
VANCOUVER
Muhaqqiq Garfami, A., Sajadizadeh, S. A., Morvarid, A. Re-Examination of the Evidence for the Islamic Ruling on the Intentional Retention of Ritual Impurity (Janabah) until Dawn in the Month of Ramadan. Jurisprudence of worship Doctrines, 2023; 4(6): 111-140. doi: 10.30513/jwd.2024.6000.1190