نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشآموختۀ دکتری، گروه علوم حدیث تطبیقی، دانشکدۀ قرآن و حدیث، دانشگاه المصطفی(ص)، قم، ایران.
2 دانشآموختۀ سطح 3، گروه مذاهب اسلامی، مؤسسۀ تخصصی مذاهب اسلامی، قم، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The invalidity of prayer caused by intentional weeping for worldly matters during prayer (Ṣalāt) has long been a matter of attention among Imami jurists. Most late jurists have regarded it as invalidating the prayer, relying on consensus or widespread juristic acceptance; however, a close examination of the sources shows that the claim of a comprehensive consensus in this matter faces serious challenges. The textual basis for invalidation is limited to two weakly transmitted reports, the very reliability of which was contested by jurists such as Ayatullah al-Burujirdi. He sought to compensate for the weakness of their chains by invoking the juridical authority of early scholarly fame (Shuhrah al-Qudamāʾ) within the framework of the Uṣūl al-Mutalaqqāt. Yet a careful review of those foundational texts shows that many of them do not address this issue at all, and that the scattered expressions found in them are more likely the result of juristic reasoning than a direct transmission from the Infallible Imam. On this basis, the claim of consensus in this field appears incomplete and non-definitive, and its evidences emerge mainly in later juristic periods, especially among jurists after Shaikh al-Tusi. The present study, employing a descriptive-analytical approach and a library-based method for data collection, has sought to emphasize the necessity of rethinking the way in which early scholarly fame is cited as evidence and the need to return to the opinions of early jurists in order to discover the extent of their fatwa-based renown (Shuhrah Fatwāʾī) or their agreement on a single opinion, for the purpose of ascertaining the opinion of the Infallible Imam (pbuh).
کلیدواژهها [English]
)