نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، مشهد، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، مشهد، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
If a person performs the congregation and Imām of congregational prayer or Imām al-jamā‘a (Arabic: إمام الجماعة) recites ‘Azāim or ‘Azāʾim al-Sujūd (Arabic: عزائم السجود) but does not perform the prostration of sūrah al-‘azīma in ṣalāh (Arabic: صلاة, prayer), on the one hand, the person who prays behind that imam must perform his/her prostration in order to hear the verse of Sajdah, and on the other hand, performing this prostration may cause interruption in prayer and the person who prays behind an imam (Arabic: مأموم, Romanized: maʾmūm) has a problem about which side to accept. Therefore, how can an accountable (mukallaf) get out of this challenge? There is a difference of opinion among Jaʿfarī jurists in this regard. According to one theory, following the imam requires that the person who prays behind an imam must also leave prostration. The second theory states that maʾmūm must prostrate and that it is not permissible for maʾmūm to follow the imam in this situation. The second theory has offered different solutions. Some jurists say that in this case, maʾmūm must perform the substitution of sajdah (by gesture). A group of jurists said that maʾmūm must use gesture and perform sajdah after finishing the prayer, and according to others, maʾmūm’s obligation is only to perform sajdah after the prayer. This article, which has studied the jurisprudential documents of the issue in analytical-descriptive way by studying ancient texts, has concluded that by following an imam, maʾmūm must not perform prostration, but due to the existence of necessary and lack of obstacles, performing gesture and pointing is obligatory for maʾmūm and maʾmūm’s prayer is correct and valid.
کلیدواژهها [English]