نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 کارشناس ارشد علوم قرآن و حدیث دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی
2 استادیار دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
One of the most extensive Jurisprudential chapters is Hajj chapter. Within the several hadiths in this chapter , part of hadiths indicates obligation creating rules (hukm taklifi) for the wealthy who are financially capable to perform more than one time. According to some hadiths, wealth makes Hajj to be compulsory in the same year whereas some other states that to fulfil once in a lifetime is enough. Muslim scholars have selected different approaches in confronting these traditions . It shows that putting aside the first category of hadiths and conveying them to the following aspects: mandatory, alternative obligation, collective obligation, purifying the pre-Islam belief of Nasī’ (i.e. postponement of months; Arabic: النّسیء), confronting the false belief of the limitation of the obligation of Hajj in the first year, the obligation of the predicable (genus) of the wealthy and purifying the belief of the class Hajj. This note with descriptive-analytic method aims to evaluate the truthfulness of these inferences. At the last step after mentioning criticisms on each of these approaches, the selected attitude with utilizing the components such as the indication of verse 97 of surah Āl `Imrān (Arabic: آل عمران), the maxim “لو کانَ لَبانَ” (If there were such a ruling, it should have been revealed or known), the well-known fuqaha giving it up (have not acted based on it) and the manner and conduct of Shi'a intellectuals it is achieved that the first category of hadiths are invalid.
کلیدواژهها [English]