نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 کارشناس ارشد علوم قرآن و حدیث دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، مشهد، ایران
2 استادیار گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، مشهد، ایران
3 دانشیار گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، مشهد، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The concept of caution (Arabic: احتیاط, Romanized: ʼIḥtiyāṭ) is considered a desirable thing according to reason (intellect) and sharīʿah (Arabic: شرِیعة). However, it is appropriate to determine a limit and criteria for it due to some possible unfortunate consequences. Paying attention to this issue is necessary in determining the religious rulings (Arabic: الأحکام الشرعیّة) of accountable (mukallafīn) people and in the form of one of the pillars of methodical Ijtihād (Arabic: اجتهاد). This article utilizes cited sources by exploratory and analytical methods to explain the most important ways to prevent the disproportionate caution of mujtahid (Arabic: مجتهد) in the position of ʼIftāʼ (Arabic: إفتاء, English: Act of issuing a fatwā or a legal opinion by an authoritative consultant in matters of law and jurisprudence). In order to achieve this goal, the concept of caution in the first step for issuing is explained and after that, the arguments of those in favor of using this method have been challenged. After that, the unfortunate consequences of this method have been explained to prove the necessity of reducing such cautions. In the next step, the following solutions have been introduced in the form of the necessity of the Ijtihād method in the position of issuing: reducing the influence of previous scholars in three areas of consensus (Arabic: إجماع, Romanized: ʼijmāʿ), tradition famous through juristic opinion (Arabic: الشهرة الفتوائیّة) and understanding of the companions, appropriate thematology, considering the interests of Islam and Muslims, paying attention to the effective propagation of religion and paying attention to the principle of latitudinarianism in rulings.
کلیدواژهها [English]