نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی
نویسنده
دانشآموختۀ کارشناسی ارشد، گروه علوم قرآن و حدیث، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، مشهد، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
One of the branches related to this obligation is the cases to which Zakat is due. When faced with the second group of narrations, jurists have chosen three perspectives: their design, carrying it on istihabbah or carrying it on taqiyyah. This research has analyzed the aforementioned narrations using a descriptive-analytical method and using isnadic sources. To achieve this goal, after explaining and criticizing each of the approaches to these narrations, it has been proven that each of them is ineffective in eliminating the conflict of narrations. In the next step, to present an appropriate approach, a number of narrations have been cited as witnesses of the majority, which include the following components: the forgiveness of the Messenger of God (PBUH) from other cases, the forgiveness of zakat on dates by Imam Kazim (PBUH), the confirmation of zakat on rice for the people of Iraq, the dependence of zakat cases according to the infallible (PBUH). The research achievement is that according to this method, the cases of zakat depend on the conditions of time, place, or material, and the Infallible (AS) or the righteous rulers of the Islamic state can determine its cases.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)