نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 گروه آموزش الهیات، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، صندوق پستی 889-14665 تهران، ایران.
2 استادیار، گروه معارف اسلامی، واحد قم، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قم، ایران .
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The aim of this study is to address the fundamental question: What is the scope of women’s prayer covering (Sitr-e Salātī), and what implications do the juristic evidences have in this regard? Consequently, this issue has been examined and analyzed from the perspective of jurisprudential evidences. This research was conducted using a library study method and a descriptive-analytical approach, whereby necessary information was obtained by referring to jurisprudential evidences and texts, and subsequently analyzed. The findings of the research indicate that while the majority of jurists believe in the obligation (Wujūb) of covering the head by women in prayer, in contrast, a group of jurists hold the view that it is not obligatory to cover the hair of the head by women during prayer. The root of this difference of opinion lies in whether "hair" (al-Shaʿr) is considered part of the "head" (al-Raʾs) or not. Therefore, it is essential and necessary that the evidences for each of the two opinions be examined and analyzed to determine which viewpoint has greater compatibility with the jurisprudential evidences. The innovation of this article lies in having identified the root of the jurists' disagreement and, through meticulous investigation and detailed examination of the evidences for each opinion, having assessed the validity of their basis for citation, and having explored various dimensions of the issue through precise biographical (Rijālī) and jurisprudential analyses. The article concludes that the view denying the obligation of covering women’s hair during prayer is supported by narrations which, upon authentication (Tawthīq), can justify such a viewpoint.
کلیدواژهها [English]
https://mfeb.ir/home/feqh1shahi-204/#_ftm13
)