نوع مقاله : علمی پژوهشی
نویسنده
طلبۀ مقطع خارجی تخصصی، مجتمع عالی فقه و علوم اسلامی، قم، ایران؛ دانشجوی دکتری فلسفۀ تعلیم و تربیت، پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه، قم، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
One of the important and disputed issues in Imami jurisprudence from ancient times to the present is the instances in which the Prostration of Forgetfulness (Sajdat al-Sahw) becomes obligatory due to errors in prayer. Despite the practical significance of this topic, no independent research has comprehensively examined all its dimensions. Given the breadth of this discussion, the present study is dedicated to examining one of its branches: the ruling of the Prostration of Forgetfulness for every unintentional addition or omission. The main research question is: what is the ruling of the Prostration of Forgetfulness for every unintentional addition or omission? On this matter, the views of jurists are highly diverse and sometimes contradictory. This research employs a descriptive-analytical method and, considering new critiques and arguments on the evidences and resolving the conflict of evidences in a novel manner, addresses the issue. The findings indicate that among the narrations affirming obligation (Wujūb), those that are complete in terms of textual indication suffer from chain of transmission (Sanad) issues. On the other hand, the reason for the non-obligation of the prostration of forgetfulness is complete. The widespread renown and indeed the consensus (Ijmāʿ) of the early jurists, as well as the principle (Aṣl), oppose obligation. There is also no valid evidence for recommendation (Istiḥbāb), nor does obligatory precaution have any place. Therefore, it is not the case that every unintentional addition or omission necessitates the Prostration of Forgetfulness.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)